Happy new year!
These year I'll write about monsters, weapons, yadda yadda, let us skip this stuff for now.
So, here is a brief idea after a long hiatus. Hopefully, I'll get back to blogging soon enough.
---
TL;DR: I'm considering allowing PCs to trade half their move (or their main action) for an additional bonus action.
---
I like the whole "action economy" of 5e. I think they've got it (mostly) nailed with actions, bonus actions and reactions, with a few exceptions - two weapon fighting, Beastmaster Rangers, etc.
However, Mike Mearls himself has suggested that it might be a good idea to get rid of bonus actions.
I often wonder about the same topic.
The most obvious solution would be trading some MOVEMENT for special actions - dodge, disengage, hide, etc. Use "half your movement" as a baseline. Not too different from getting up if you're prone, for example, or how disengage worked in B/X.
Other simple actions could be "part of your attack". Drawing a knife or arrow, for example. Drawing a zweihander might cost you some movement, so an unprepared warrior with a heavy weapon would be less mobile. Nice!
Other things - like rage, for example - might be better portrayed as reactions. I like the barbarians' rage triggering in response to some event, at least in the first few levels.
What about bonus action spells? Well, I'm not the greatest fan TBH. Most of them seem to be created to allow you to create a special weapon and attack with it. So, just add hat to the spell's description.
In short... bonus action serves as an abbreviation, a shortcut to the idea that you can do this "thing" and still get your main action, but you cannot do two of these "things" in the same round. Which is not always a good thing - rangers, for example, have too much stuff competing for their actions.
In short, the whole "bonus action" concept isn't necessary... but a good enough shortcut. Because of that, I am not sure if getting rid of them would make the game any simpler.
If I were to make a "realistic" system from that, I'd probably give each character a few TOKENS representing their movement. Say, one blue token for each 5 feet of movement (these can be used for various kinds of movement). Then one red token for each attack or spell (a fighter with four attacks gains four tokens). Whoever surprises the other side, rolls high enough for initiative, has some rogue-like reflexes, etc., gains a few green tokens that cannot be used, only held until the end of the round.
The creature with the most tokens acts first, spending some of their tokens - maybe from one to three, at most.
So, the fighter with four attacks can probably pull a knife and stab a CR 1 monster three times before it reacts... But if he has a battleaxe, he might have to spend a couple of blue tokens to draw it before attacking, which might be enough to let you attack back, unless you're surprised, etc.
This would lead to more "organic" battles, as I intended here.
These lead to endless permutations, of course. Tokens for reactions - why not? Additional tokens for critical hits of misses, maybe depending on weapon speed, etc.
Probably too much work for little effect. But something I would definitely use for a more "tactical" version of D&D in line with 4e, etc.
For now, I might just allow PCs to trade half their move (or their main action) for an additional bonus action. Maybe fighters get one additional bonus action for extra attack, provided they use it for TWF, etc.
Next: maybe a(nother) simple yet detailed "fix" for two-weapon fighting or weapon speed, based on this post.
I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man's. I will not reason and compare: my business is to create.
- William Blake
Friday, January 11, 2019
Speed, initiative, bonus actions and the action economy...
Marcadores:
5e,
Combat,
D&D,
Design,
House rules,
Initiative,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Old school,
Rewriting,
RPG,
Weapons and Armor
Friday, November 23, 2018
Super-critical hits!
Random idea I can't get off my mind lately:
Super criticals
Roll 1d4.
1: Maximum damage.
2: Double damage.
3: Triple damage;
4: Special (depends on weapon, armor, etc).
Example: if your usual damage is 1d6+3, maximum damage is 9, double damage is 2d6+6* (Average 13), triple damage is 3d6+9* (average 19.5).
*OR just roll 1d6+3 and multiply by two or three.
How?
A super-critical is achieved when you crit and beat the target AC by 10 or more, or when you have advantage an roll 20 on both dice. In some circumstances, all your crits will be super-crits, while in others none will (however, you can reach crits through combos - see my next post).
I thought of this as a rule for my Dark Fantasy Basic but you can obviously use for D&D 5e, etc. Notice that "maximum damage" result is slightly worse than the usual 5e crit... but it kinda FEELS better IMO, and is one less roll.
Why?
I just like crits! They are exciting, fun and a great way of differentiating weapons and characters, since only a few hits will be crits. It also gives you that "urgency" - the fight may suddenly take a sharp turn for the better or worse...
However, I get bored by long tables and dislike stopping combats to check complex rules/charts.
Super-crits are intuitive and significant. "Special" results - you can put whatever you want there, but should be very significant, and maybe IN ADDITION to triple damage - will happen less than 2% of the time. THEN you can use a table or complex rules. Almost 99% of the time, things will be straightforward.
Notice that this crits will make the difference between creatures of different HD/CR more significant. A level 10 fighter will be very likely to destroy one orc per critical hit in 5e - or even an ogre (4+1 HD) in B/X or DFB.
Likewise, heroes must think twice before attacking something that is out of their league. In 5e, this means the need for "minions" for high-CR foes is made a bit less relevant.
Well, that's it for now.
Super criticals
Roll 1d4.
1: Maximum damage.
2: Double damage.
3: Triple damage;
4: Special (depends on weapon, armor, etc).
Example: if your usual damage is 1d6+3, maximum damage is 9, double damage is 2d6+6* (Average 13), triple damage is 3d6+9* (average 19.5).
*OR just roll 1d6+3 and multiply by two or three.
How?
A super-critical is achieved when you crit and beat the target AC by 10 or more, or when you have advantage an roll 20 on both dice. In some circumstances, all your crits will be super-crits, while in others none will (however, you can reach crits through combos - see my next post).
I thought of this as a rule for my Dark Fantasy Basic but you can obviously use for D&D 5e, etc. Notice that "maximum damage" result is slightly worse than the usual 5e crit... but it kinda FEELS better IMO, and is one less roll.
Why?
I just like crits! They are exciting, fun and a great way of differentiating weapons and characters, since only a few hits will be crits. It also gives you that "urgency" - the fight may suddenly take a sharp turn for the better or worse...
However, I get bored by long tables and dislike stopping combats to check complex rules/charts.
Super-crits are intuitive and significant. "Special" results - you can put whatever you want there, but should be very significant, and maybe IN ADDITION to triple damage - will happen less than 2% of the time. THEN you can use a table or complex rules. Almost 99% of the time, things will be straightforward.
Notice that this crits will make the difference between creatures of different HD/CR more significant. A level 10 fighter will be very likely to destroy one orc per critical hit in 5e - or even an ogre (4+1 HD) in B/X or DFB.
Likewise, heroes must think twice before attacking something that is out of their league. In 5e, this means the need for "minions" for high-CR foes is made a bit less relevant.
Well, that's it for now.
Marcadores:
5e,
Basic D&D,
Brainstorming,
Combat,
D&D,
Dark Fantasy Basic,
Design,
Dice,
hit points,
House rules,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Old school,
OSR,
Rewriting,
RPG,
Weapons and Armor
Monday, November 12, 2018
Concocting constructs
Here is a small part from TERATOGENICON, the ultimate monster generator! If you like it, consider acquiring the book on DTRPG. I wrote this post before publishing the book, so some of the text has been update. The tables and pages you see below are exactly as presented in the book.
(The images are copyright WotC, as far as I can tell, and are not included in the book - which is lavishly illustrated by Rick Troula!)
Marcadores:
5e,
D&D,
Days of the Damned,
House rules,
Monster,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Random table,
Rewriting,
RPG
Saturday, November 03, 2018
Celestial Creation
From an early draft of Teratogenicon:
Celestials are creatures native to the Upper Planes. Many
of them are the servants of deities, employed as messengers or agents in the
mortal realm and throughout the planes. Celestials are good by nature, so the
exceptional celestial who strays from a good alignment is a horrifying rarity.
Celestials include angels, couatls, and pegasi.
A typical celestial has the
following traits:
Size:
any.
Alignment: Lawful
Good.
Abilities: varies.
Common
resistances/immunities: charm, fear, nonmagical attacks.
Senses:
Darkvision.
Languages: Common,
Celestial, and many other languages.
Challenge:
2d6.
Habits,
diet and habitat
Celestials live in different planes to
humankind and often come with a specific mission. Angels and their kind can
live anywhere and do not need to eat, drink or sleep. Animal-shaped celestials,
such as unicorn and pegasi, are usually more mundane in this aspect.
Appearance & Powers
A celestial’s heavenly nature manifests
in their appearance, as auras of gold, shining armor, and feathered wings. When
they take humanoid form, they are healthy, strong, and thin specimens. Some
celestial are somewhat more mysterious and less human, as if to indicate they
are somewhat superior or different from mundane beings (the last eight entries
are darker than the rest; use 1d12 if you want a more traditional look).
Attacks. Celestials often carry big magic weapons with impressive special
properties. Even when unarmed, their attacks are usually considered to be equivalent
to magical weapons.
Some celestials can project attack with
beams of radiant damage, auras of fire, and so on (spheres of energy originate
on the celestial but do not affect it). Celestials without ranged attacks will
often have strong defensive powers (teleportation, invisibility, etc.).
Energy. This table applies to the celestial’s attack and possibility to
their features as well – fire halos, radiant wings, lighting auras, and so on.
Animals. Some celestials look like animals - examples are winged lions,
golden stags, unicorns, etc. Some were actually animals once, now ascended by
the contact with higher powers (in this case, their attacks will probably be
unarmed – although some animals may carry weapons in their mouths or possess
intelligent weapons that fight by themselves on command). Other celestials have
animal features, animal motifs in their clothing, animal companions, or the
ability to transform into animals. The list below contains the animals most
commonly associated with celestials.
Color/metal. These colors and metals are commonly applied to celestial features
– clothes, eyes, wings, hair, skin, etc.
Origins
and goals
Celestials are
usually created by deities, but there are other possibilities. Their goals are
usually benevolent, but not always. Notice that some deities have draconic laws
against insignificant sins (wearing the wrong color in a temple, eating
forbidden food, etc.).
Tables
All art: copyright Peter Mohrbacher.
---
If you enjoyed this post, you'll certainly enjoy the final version: Teratogenicon, the ultimate monster builder! It is full of random tables like the ones above and it has amazing art by Rick Troula. Chek the previews to see what I mean!
Marcadores:
5e,
D&D,
Days of the Damned,
House rules,
Monster,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Random table,
Rewriting,
RPG,
Teratogenicon
Saturday, October 20, 2018
ABERRATION GENERATION!!! (5e)
From an early draft of Teratogenicon:
Aberrations are the strangest and most variable type of monster. A giant with two heads or blue skin is still a giant; a giant with a head on its stomach, a serpent for a tongue and half a dozen slimy tentacles where the legs should be is probably an aberration.
Some aberrations are very
intelligent while others are dumber than farm animals, but most of them are
utterly unpredictable. Their alien, deranged minds are capable of feats unknown
to most of humankind – innate magic, telepathy, baffling schemes and
calculations – but can also make them erratic and self-destructive. Few
aberrations have humanlike capacities – most are either incredibly gifted or
incredibly stupid, although some appear to be both.
Habits,
diet and habitat
Aberrations are alien
enough to defy comprehension. They are mostly inscrutable, although many behave
like common predators, killing for food and sport. Most aberrations need food
and water to survive, although some seem to subside on psychic energies, ether,
or other mystical energies. They often live in forgotten dungeons, temples and
caves, away from human eyes, since none in their right mind would suffer them
to exist.
Traits
A typical aberration
has the following traits:
Size: any.
Alignment: Chaotic Evil.
Abilities: good Strength, Constitution; bad
Charisma, Intelligence.
Senses: darkvision 60 ft.
Languages: Few aberrations can comprehend
languages and even fewer can speak. If they do, it is likely Deep Speech, Common,
or Undercommon.
Challenge: 2d6.
Attacks: upper limbs (see below) and others.
Appearance. The first five tables describe an
aberration’s appearance – skin, upper and lower limbs, body and special
features. There is no entry for heads – the head, if any, will be appropriate
to the body most of the times (amoebas will rarely have heads, octopuses have
heads and no bodies, etc.). However, you can roll twice on the body table to
produce a different head.
A monster with no
upper limbs must attack with the lower limbs or other body parts (bite, slam,
etc.). A monster with no lower limbs may use pseudopods, some form levitation,
move with the upper limbs, or just roll around.
Special Powers
1. Genius: The monster has genius-level Intelligence (18 or more), knows a few languages and mental skills, and gains one additional special attack appropriate for an intelligent creature (psionic blast, ray gun, spellcasting, etc.).
2. Telepathy: The monster can magically transmit simple messages and images to any creature within 120 feet of it that can understand a language, and detect the overall intentions of their foes from the same distance.
3. False Appearance: While the monster remains motionless, it is indistinguishable from a common object, animal or terrain feature (rug, tree, cow, humanoid in robes, stalagmite, bundle of ropes, etc.).
4. Teleporting: As an action, the monster can teleport, along with any equipment it is wearing or carrying, up to 120 feet to an unoccupied space it can see.
5. Aberrant Ground: The ground in a 10-foot radius around the monster is difficult terrain (doughlike, frozen, slippery, filled with tentacles, etc.). Each creature that starts its turn in that area must succeed on a Strength saving throw or have its speed reduced to 0 until the start of its next turn.
6. Regeneration: The monster regains (2xCR) hit points at the start of its turn. If the monster takes one specific kind of damage (choose one from fire, acid, radiant, etc.), this trait doesn’t function at the start of the monster’s next turn. The monster dies only if it starts its turn with 0 hit points and doesn’t regenerate.
7. Carapace: the monster has a thick carapace that adds +2 bonus to AC and all Dexterity saving throws.
8. Fog: the monster is constantly surrounded by a thick fog (or illusion, cloud of darkness, etc.) that makes it invisible to all creatures that are not within 15 feet of the monster.
9. Four-dimensional: the monster lives in four dimensions and occasionally shifts out of existence. As a bonus action, the monster can roll 1d4. On a 1 or 2, nothing happens. On a 3, it shifts partially out of the three known dimensions, becoming heavily obscured. On 4, it enters a fourth dimension, where it is still visible yet it cannot affect or be affected by anything on the material plane. The effects last until the beginning of its next turn.
10. Shapechanger: The monster can use its action to polymorph into a Small or Medium humanoid it has eaten in the past, or back into its true form. Its statistics, other than its size, are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn’t transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
11. Engulf: As an action, the monster engulfs a Medium or smaller creature Grappled by it. The engulfed target is Blinded, Restrained, and unable to breathe, and it must succeed on a Constitution saving throw at the start of each of the monster’s turns or take (2xCR) bludgeoning damage. If the monster moves, the engulfed target moves with it. The monster can have only one creature engulfed at a time.
12. Drain: As an action, the monster deals (CRx1) damage to a creature, and regains hit points equal to the damage the creature takes. The target must be grappled (blood drain) or charmed (psychic drain) by the monster.
13. Alien Mind: The monster is immune to scrying and to any effect that would sense its emotions, read its thoughts, or detect its location. In addition, if a creature attempts to do any of these things it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take (CRx1) psychic damage and suffer the Stunned condition for one round.
14. Replicating: The monster is usually accompanied by 2d4 smaller versions of it, with lower CRs. The sum of their CRs cannot exceed the monster’s CR.
15. Horrific Appearance: Any humanoid that starts its turn within 30 feet of the monster and can see it must make a Wisdom saving throw. On a failed save, the creature is Frightened for 1 minute. A creature can repeat the saving throw at the end of each of its turns, with disadvantage if the monster is within line of sight, ending the effect on itself on a success. If a creature’s saving throw is successful or the effect ends for it, the creature is immune to the monster’s Horrific Appearance for the next 24 hours. Unless the target is surprised, the target can avert its eyes and avoid making the initial saving throw. Until the start of its next turn, a creature that averts its eyes has disadvantage on attack rolls against the monster.
16. Magic Resistance: The monster has advantage on saving throws against spells and other magical effects.
17. Flying: The monster has a 30 feet flying speed.
18. Gibbering: The monster babbles incoherently while it can see any creature and isn't Incapacitated. Each creature that starts its turn within 20 feet of the monster and can hear the gibbering must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw. On a failure, the creature can't take reactions until the start of its next turn and rolls a d8 to determine what it does during its turn. On a 1 to 4, the creature does nothing. On a 5 or 6, the creature takes no action or Bonus Action and uses all its Movement to move in a randomly determined direction. On a 7 or 8, the creature makes a melee Attack against a randomly determined creature within its reach or does nothing if it can't make such an Attack.
19. Telekinetic field: While the monster is conscious, it has advantage in Strength and Dexterity saving throws. Melee attacks against the monster have disadvantage, and ranged attacks miss automatically.
20. Roll twice
Color images: copyright WotC. B&W images: art by Rick Troula - see below!
---
If you enjoyed this post, you'll certainly enjoy the final version: Teratogenicon, the ultimate monster builder! It is full of random tables like the ones above and it has amazing art by Rick Troula. Chek the previews to see what I mean!
Marcadores:
5e,
D&D,
Days of the Damned,
House rules,
Monster,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Random table,
Rewriting,
RPG,
Teratogenicon
Friday, October 12, 2018
Detailed initiative (5e) - Half turns, etc.
I've discussed 5e initiative here. As mentioned in the comments (thanks Sean and everybody that commented for the feedback), I like the idea of detailed initiative. The hard part is making it simple.
The idea:
Every fight begins with a fast turn. After this turn, everybody takes a slow turn, and so on.
In a fast turn, you can move half your speed (round down), make half you attacks (round down), etc.
In a slow turn, you can do the same, but round up. Most actions happen in the slow turn, but, like attacks, they are subjected to "halving" if possible (if you choose to "Dash", for example, you just double your movement for both turns).
It is very likely that you have to declare your action during or after the fast turn.
Let us say a fighter has three attacks and moves 35 feet in a turn: he could move 15 feet and attack once in a fast turn, and move 20 feet and attack twice in a slow turn.
Explanation:
As I've said,the problem is not easy to solve - but easy enough to reduce by half.
For example, instead of of having a whole turn where you get up, move 15 feet, and attack you opponent three times while he DOES NOTHING, a more "organic" solution would be something like: you move 10 feet, he moves 5 feet, you attack twice, he attacks once, you attack once more, then he attacks, etc.
The inspiration for this idea is Shadow of the Demon Lord, BTW.
Weapon speed
Two guys are facing each other, 30 feet apart. One has a dagger, the other a halberd. Who hits first? Obviously, the halberd (unless you THROW the dagger, which is an interesting distinction); but most RPGs that get to this level of detail say that the dagger attacks first (this includes the 5e DMG optional rules).
Which is why I'd say weapon speed shouldn't be about who attacks FIRST, but who attacks AGAIN first. The guy with the halberd might hit first, but the guy with a dagger could stab a foe three times during one halberd swing.
Easiest way to do this: a critical hit gives you a CHANCE to attack again. The faster the weapon (an the greater the number of attack you have), the greater the chance. Or, to make things faster, the GM could roll a single dice every round: every weapon with a speed above that threshold gains an extra attack.
If you want to account for weapon reach, being approached by a foe with a shorter weapon allows you to attack first if you're not engaged with anyone else (an opportunity attack would be an appropriate alternative to this).
Spells and spell interruption
I like the idea of spell interruption, which is not an important thing in D&D 5e. In this system, you could probably choose a spell to use in your fast turn, and only "fire" it in a slow turn. Alternatively, you could only use spells of a (spell slot) level that is half your maximum in your fast turns. For example, if you can cast 9th level spells, you could cast a 4th level spell in your fast turn, OR prepare a 9th level spell to cast in your slow turn.
I'm tempted to say that, in the first case, you could ALSO cast ANOTHER 4th level spell in your slow turn - provided you didn't lose concentration between turns.
Bonus actions/reactions/object interactions
I would probably allow reaction in BOTH rounds. Seems to me that it would be a welcome addition. Same goes for object interactions.
Bonus actions are trickier; limiting to one per round seems more reasonable, but see below.
Choices
One way to make this system more tactical is allowing some choice. Usually, you can move AND attack, but if you decide not to move, maybe you can take an additional bonus action (not more than one bonus action per turn), cast an additional spell (4th+4th, as seem below), or make an attack in your fast turn, if you have a single attack. If you have multiple attacks, you could use a crossbow multiple times without moving, or a net and trident, etc.
Pros
- Shorter turns means players pay more attention.
- The "ready" action makes a bit more sense.
- Tactical choices.
- Organic movement./attacks.
- Spell interruption.
- Interesting use for low-level spells at high levels.
- Action Surge looks better.
- TWF could be "fixed" by something like this (more object interactions, more bonus actions, etc). Same goes for crossbow, net, etc.
- More straightforward than checking the DMG table.
Cons
Frankly, this level of detail isn't appreciated by many, and I'm not sure I'm willing to put up with it. "old school" initiative, with phases and all, still sound a bit simpler to me. Still, for a combat-oriented game, I feel this could be fun.
The idea:
Every fight begins with a fast turn. After this turn, everybody takes a slow turn, and so on.
In a fast turn, you can move half your speed (round down), make half you attacks (round down), etc.
In a slow turn, you can do the same, but round up. Most actions happen in the slow turn, but, like attacks, they are subjected to "halving" if possible (if you choose to "Dash", for example, you just double your movement for both turns).
It is very likely that you have to declare your action during or after the fast turn.
Let us say a fighter has three attacks and moves 35 feet in a turn: he could move 15 feet and attack once in a fast turn, and move 20 feet and attack twice in a slow turn.
Explanation:
As I've said,the problem is not easy to solve - but easy enough to reduce by half.
For example, instead of of having a whole turn where you get up, move 15 feet, and attack you opponent three times while he DOES NOTHING, a more "organic" solution would be something like: you move 10 feet, he moves 5 feet, you attack twice, he attacks once, you attack once more, then he attacks, etc.
The inspiration for this idea is Shadow of the Demon Lord, BTW.
Weapon speed
Two guys are facing each other, 30 feet apart. One has a dagger, the other a halberd. Who hits first? Obviously, the halberd (unless you THROW the dagger, which is an interesting distinction); but most RPGs that get to this level of detail say that the dagger attacks first (this includes the 5e DMG optional rules).
Which is why I'd say weapon speed shouldn't be about who attacks FIRST, but who attacks AGAIN first. The guy with the halberd might hit first, but the guy with a dagger could stab a foe three times during one halberd swing.
Easiest way to do this: a critical hit gives you a CHANCE to attack again. The faster the weapon (an the greater the number of attack you have), the greater the chance. Or, to make things faster, the GM could roll a single dice every round: every weapon with a speed above that threshold gains an extra attack.
If you want to account for weapon reach, being approached by a foe with a shorter weapon allows you to attack first if you're not engaged with anyone else (an opportunity attack would be an appropriate alternative to this).
Spells and spell interruption
I like the idea of spell interruption, which is not an important thing in D&D 5e. In this system, you could probably choose a spell to use in your fast turn, and only "fire" it in a slow turn. Alternatively, you could only use spells of a (spell slot) level that is half your maximum in your fast turns. For example, if you can cast 9th level spells, you could cast a 4th level spell in your fast turn, OR prepare a 9th level spell to cast in your slow turn.
I'm tempted to say that, in the first case, you could ALSO cast ANOTHER 4th level spell in your slow turn - provided you didn't lose concentration between turns.
Bonus actions/reactions/object interactions
I would probably allow reaction in BOTH rounds. Seems to me that it would be a welcome addition. Same goes for object interactions.
Bonus actions are trickier; limiting to one per round seems more reasonable, but see below.
Choices
One way to make this system more tactical is allowing some choice. Usually, you can move AND attack, but if you decide not to move, maybe you can take an additional bonus action (not more than one bonus action per turn), cast an additional spell (4th+4th, as seem below), or make an attack in your fast turn, if you have a single attack. If you have multiple attacks, you could use a crossbow multiple times without moving, or a net and trident, etc.
Pros
- Shorter turns means players pay more attention.
- The "ready" action makes a bit more sense.
- Tactical choices.
- Organic movement./attacks.
- Spell interruption.
- Interesting use for low-level spells at high levels.
- Action Surge looks better.
- TWF could be "fixed" by something like this (more object interactions, more bonus actions, etc). Same goes for crossbow, net, etc.
- More straightforward than checking the DMG table.
Cons
Frankly, this level of detail isn't appreciated by many, and I'm not sure I'm willing to put up with it. "old school" initiative, with phases and all, still sound a bit simpler to me. Still, for a combat-oriented game, I feel this could be fun.
Marcadores:
5e,
Brainstorming,
Combat,
D&D,
Design,
House rules,
Initiative,
Multipurpose mechanics,
Rewriting,
RPG,
Weapons and Armor
Saturday, October 06, 2018
Super-fast 5e monsters
If you know proficiency bonus, everything else is easy to find.
Attack bonus: proficiency x 2
Save DC: 8 + proficiency x 2
Damage: 5+(CRx5)
HP: 15+(CRx15)
"Good" saves/skills/checks: proficiency x 1.5
"Weak" saves/skills/checks: half proficiency, if any
AC: 10 + "Good" save.
Why? Well...
Attack bonus: double proficiency is meant to encompass both proficiency bonus an ability bonuses. These will be close to PC's bonuses.
Save DC: calculated like PC's save DCs.
HP and Damage: based on the DMG. Number of attacks is not that important. A limited attack ("recharge 4-6", etc.) affects a whole area (example: breath weapon) and, unless you succeed on a save, deal double damage (10+CRx10).
Good/weak saves: these are simplifications; monsters could have six different saves, but it is a decent approximation.
AC: start with unarmored. Since you don't add proficiency to AC most of the time, it is a bit lower than attack bonus. At high levels, monster will be easier to hit, but will be able to take more punishment as PC damage will not usually keep up with monster HP (at least for fighters).
Smoother table:
| CR | Prof | x0.5 | x1.5 | x2 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 10 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 13 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| 15 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 16 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| 17 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| 18 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 19 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 20 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 13 |
| 21 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 22 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 14 |
| 23 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 14 |
| 24 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| 25 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| 26 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 27 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 28 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 17 |
| 29 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 17 |
| 30 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 18 |
Special thanks:
- Unknown user that commented here.
UPDATE: If you want to create your own monsters, take a look at Teratogenicon, our most impressive book so far. Check the previews to see for yourself!
Marcadores:
5e,
Brainstorming,
Combat,
D&D,
Design,
hit points,
House rules,
Monster,
quick fix,
Rewriting,
RPG
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









