In my endless quest for minimalist OSR systems, I've been thinking of minimalist classes lately. At the risk of repeating myself, here is how it goes:
- Mages get ONE new spell per level, and get +1 to spellcasting.
- Fighters get +1 to attack per level, but they also get extra attacks and, indirectly, more damage.
- Thieves get ONE new skill per level.
The LotFP method of using "skill points" works well, but this is even more minimalist and simple. I think I got the idea from a Brazilian YouTuber, DM Quiral.
Now, you either have a skill or you don't. If you do, you will occasionally succeed automatically. If numbers are necessary, you get a +10 bonus. But, mostly, you don't roll: you can simply be able to do ventriloquism, juggling, appraising, etc.
E.g., B/X suggests an ability check for climbing a rope (which RAW indicates the thief has better chance climbing sheer walls...). If you have "climbing", you get a +10 bonus, which often means automatic success.
If you prefer X-in-6 chances, +10 translates to +3. E.g., the thief has 4-in-6 instead of 1-in-6 chances of hearing noises.
For challenging stuff (climb "sheer walls"), the GM may require a skill check... Other PCs get a -10 penalty, but you roll your ability as usual, since your +10 bonus compensates that.
This simple system addresses some of the common problems I have with skills:
- How can a 1st-level PC be really good in a given skill.
- How non-thief characters can try to do thief stuff.
- You do not have to write a bunch of skills into every thieves' sheet, let alone other PCs.
HOWEVER it loses some of the compatibility with the original thief.
One alternative is, instead of giving ONE +10 skill, you give the thief TEN +1 skills. The usual ones: hear, climb, hide, traps, read languages, scrolls, back-stab, etc. By level 2, you get a +2 bonus and so on, until level 10.
This still leaves the thief behind the mage. Remember, the mage gets:
- More spells (i.e., variety).
- New spells that ARE BETTER.
- Old spells GET BETTER.
Meaning: if you succeed by 10 or more, your results are particularly impressive. Maybe you can "climb silently" or help your allies. Maybe you sneak so proficiently that you get a bonus on top of your back-stab. Etc.
Still, the thief should maybe get both more skills and better chances - especially if using the same XP table.
Anyway, its a start.
ReplyDelete"So, maybe the thief deserves some equivalent to "critical hits". Not only he is more likely to succeed, he succeeds BETTER than an untrained PC"
Or, maybe, a thief never fail, instead he gets a partial success, like in a pbta games.
Maybe both: a thief that never fails AND the chance of awesome success.
Delete